Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 02:04

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
2025 NCAA baseball bracket: Men's College World Series scores, schedule - NCAA.com
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Would you join a gym or workout at home and why?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Deportees are being held in a converted shipping container in Djibouti, ICE says - NPR
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
500-Million-Year-Old Mystery Fossil Rewrites Early Animal Evolution - SciTechDaily
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trader Joe's recalls another food item in California over listeria concerns - SFGATE
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.